Borsuk's conjecture
The Borsuk problem in geometry, for historical reasons incorrectly called Borsuk's conjecture, is a question in discrete geometry.
Problem
In 1932 Karol Borsuk showed[1] that an ordinary 3-dimensional ball in Euclidean space can be easily dissected into 4 solids, each of which has a smaller diameter than the ball, and generally d-dimensional ball can be covered with d + 1 compact sets of diameters smaller than the ball. At the same time he proved that d subsets are not enough in general. The proof is based on the Borsuk–Ulam theorem. That led Borsuk to a general question:
- Die folgende Frage bleibt offen: Lässt sich jede beschränkte Teilmenge E des Raumes
in (n + 1) Mengen zerlegen, von denen jede einen kleineren Durchmesser als E hat?[1]
This can be translated as:
- The following question remains open: Can every bounded subset E of the space
be partitioned into (n + 1) sets, each of which has a smaller diameter than E?
The question got a positive answer in the following cases:
- d = 2 — which is the original result by Karol Borsuk (1932).
- d = 3 — shown by Julian Perkal (1947),[2] and independently, 8 years later, by H. G. Eggleston (1955).[3] A simple proof was found later by Branko Grünbaum and Aladár Heppes.
- For all d for the smooth convex bodies — shown by Hugo Hadwiger (1946).[4][5]
- For all d for centrally-symmetric bodies — shown by A.S. Riesling (1971).[6]
- For all d for bodies of revolution — shown by Boris Dekster (1995).[7]
The problem was finally solved in 1993 by Jeff Kahn and Gil Kalai, who showed that the general answer to Borsuk's question is no.[8] Their construction shows that d + 1 pieces do not suffice for d = 1,325 and for each d > 2,014.
After Andriy V. Bondarenko had shown that Borsuk’s conjecture is false for all d ≥ 65,[9] [10] the current best bound, due to Thomas Jenrich, is 64.[11][12]
Apart from finding the minimum number d of dimensions such that the number of pieces mathematicians are interested in finding the general behavior of the function
. Kahn and Kalai show that in general (that is for d big enough), one needs
number of pieces. They also quote the upper bound by Oded Schramm, who showed that for every ε, if d is sufficiently large,
.[13] The correct order of magnitude of α(d) is still unknown.[14] However, it is conjectured that there is a constant c > 1 such that
for all d ≥ 1.
See also
- Hadwiger's conjecture on covering convex bodies with smaller copies of themselves
References
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
Cite error: Invalid <references>
tag; parameter "group" is allowed only.
<references />
, or <references group="..." />
Further reading
- Oleg Pikhurko, Algebraic Methods in Combinatorics, course notes.
- Aicke Hinrichs and Christian Richter, New sets with large Borsuk numbers, Discrete Mathematics 270 (2003), 137–147
- Andrei M. Raigorodskii, The Borsuk partition problem: the seventieth anniversary, Mathematical Intelligencer 26 (2004), no. 3, 4–12.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
External links
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.