Fukiishi

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

File:Goshikizuka kofun02s3200.jpg
The round end of Goshikizuka Kofun in Kobe covered with restored fukiishi

Fukiishi (葺石 or 葺き石 "roofing stone") were a means of covering burial chambers and burial mounds during the kofun period of Japan (c. 250–538). Stones collected from riverbeds were affixed to the slopes of raised kofun and other burial chambers. They are considered to have descended from forms used in Yayoi-period tumuli. They are common in the early and mid-Kofun periods, but most late Kofun-period tumuli do not have them.


Origin and ancestry

File:Nishidani Graves 02.JPG
What are thought to be proto-fukiishi at Nishidani kofun No. 3 in Izumo, Shimane

Tombs covered with fukiishi appear sporadically in Western Japan from the mid-Yayoi period and continue into the Kofun period.[1] Fukiishi are thought to be one element of the characteristics of the period of kofun at the time that they were making their first appearance; what are thought of as the oldest examples of what was to lead the generally fixed form are seen at Hashihaka kofun (ja) and the presumed slightly older Hokeno-yama kofun (ja) in the city of Sakurai in Nara Prefecture.[2] Neither fukiishi nor haniwa accompany mounds from before regularization such as at the Makimuku keyhole-shaped kofun group (ja).[citation needed]

The hariishi (貼石) seen at the Yosumi Tosshutsu funkyūbo (ja) ("four corner projections type grave mound") in the San'in region in Western Japan are often put forth as an ancestor of fukiishi. The perimeter of the foot of kofun No. 3 of Nishidani kofungun (ja) in Izumo in Shimane Prefecture is completely covered with hariishi. The burial mound at the Tatetsuki (ja) archaeological site in the city of Sōja in Okayama Prefecture is surrounded with rows of stones; such examples are widely seen in the San'in and the nearby San'yō regions, where examples of burial mounds demarcated by stacks of stone walls are also seen.[3]

Terminology

In his report on an excavation in 1915 on mound No. 21 of Saitobaru kofungun burial mound group in what is now the city of Saito in Miyazaki Prefecture, historian Ryū Imanishi (ja) titled an entry hyōmen no fukiishi ("surface roofing stones")[lower-alpha 1] in which he described the condition of the fukiishi in a ground plan and cross-section.[4]

The term fukiishi came into use as an archaeological term largely due to the influence of Kenji Takahashi's (ja) book Kofun to jōbunka ("Kofun and ancient culture", 1922).[lower-alpha 2] Via examples of kofun in the Kinai capital region Takashi described the fukiishi there as serving both practical and decorative purposes: in practical terms the use of pebbles provided protection from the wind, rain, and cold, while the stones served to beautify the mound which was after all built above ground to attract public attention and to impress and rouse piety in visiting worshippers.[5]

Research

File:Jirobeeduka1goukofun-1.JPG
Jirobēzuka mound No. 1 in Kani in Gifu Prefecture is roofed with fukiishi made up of riverbed stones.

Excavation of fukiishi themselves was nearly nonexistent before World War II. It was only after the war that scientific examination, verification, and surveying of the stones took place.[6]

In 1953, Yoshirō Kondō (ja) led a group of specialists, locals, and students in an excavation at the Tsukinowa kofun (ja) in Misaki[lower-alpha 3] in Okayama. The group surveyed three quarters of the kofun, with a height of 10 m and a diameter of 60 m. The report published in 1960 gave the extent of distribution, shape and size, petrological analysis, technical analysis of the roofing method, and minute illustration the configuration of the individual stones. The report estimated the number of stones at about 80,000.[7]

In response to the rapid increase in the post-war period of large-scale development that led to in the destruction of historical ruins, urgent excavations were carried out with the goal of thorough examination rather than as the preservation of documentation. As a result of this early research, Shōzō Haraguchi and Tadashi Nishitani (ja) published a paper in 1967 on the excavation of tumulus C1 of the Bentenyama kofungun group in Takatsuki in Osaka. The paper notes the results of investigation into the stacking methods, the weight and number of stones per unit area, the collection areas and transportation routes of the stones, and other details.[8] Tadashi Aoki (ja) stated that following this report hardly any other resulting from such an accumulation of verifiable details on fukiishi has appeared.[6]

Research into fukiishi has come to require knowledge related to construction technology.[9] To enable the scientific qualification and quantification of research documentation, Hisanori Ishizuka has called for research on:[10]

  1. Palaeoecology
  2. Soil mechanics
  3. Structural engineering
  4. Materials
  5. Fukiishi construction
  6. Structural masonry

Materials and construction methods

The material for fukiishi was often made up of pebbles and stones from dry riverbeds. In the case of pebbles, a variety of stones was used. For example, the late-4th-century Matsuokayama kofun (ja) in Kashiwara in Osaka Prefecture was made with andesite flagstones in vertical or sloped piles.[11] Other sites used chert, sandstone, slate, basalt, or other types of stone.[citation needed]

Embankments were often made with soil transported from other areas. Pollen analysis of the fifth- and sixth-century kofuns of the Kuboizumi-Maruyama Historic Sites in Saga has shown clear disparities in the vegetation in the soil of the mound faces and that of the surrounding environment. This example suggests that the borrow pits for the construction of the mounds were in remote locations.[12]

Purpose and function

File:Nagare tomb kubire.JPG
The early 5th-century Nagare-san kofun, of the Umami kofungun (ja) group in Kawai in Nara Prefecture
Half of the restored mound is covered with fukiishi.

The purpose of fukiishi is seen, as in Kenji Takahashi's account of 1922, to protect the burial mound while projecting its majesty.[13] As they were used primarily on slopes and rarely on flat surfaces it is also thought they may have served to prevent runoff, and may have contributed to waterproofing and drainage.[citation needed] They may also have been used to imply the mound was sacred, holy ground and clearly differentiate it from adjacent areas.[3] Archaeologist Kazuo Hirose (ja) notes the use of fukiishi may be related to a desire to make royalty visible and exhibit the people's connection with royalty, a feature he sees as characteristic of Japanese burial mounds in comparison with those of other Asian countries, and in particular in the case of keyhole-shaped kofun.[14]

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Demise

The scale of kofun construction peaked in the middle of the Kofun period in the mid-5th century, reflecting the power and influence of the political structure and the social status of the entombed via the form and scale of the tumuli. Towards the close of the 5th century, the construction of large keyhole-shaped kofun and groups of layered kofun waned.[citation needed]

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Kofun restoration

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Gallery

Notes

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

Cite error: Invalid <references> tag; parameter "group" is allowed only.

Use <references />, or <references group="..." />

References

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

Cite error: Invalid <references> tag; parameter "group" is allowed only.

Use <references />, or <references group="..." />

Works cited

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.


External links

  1. Ishino 1990, p. 5.
  2. Shiraishi 2002, p. 49.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Kondō 2001, p. 141.
  4. Ishizuka 1992, p. 60.
  5. Ishizuka 1992, p. 60–61.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Aoki 2003, p. 179.
  7. Ishizuka 1992, p. 61.
  8. Haraguchi & Nishitani 1967.
  9. Ishizuka 1992, p. 62.
  10. Ishizuka 1992, pp. 62–67.
  11. Ishino 1992, p. [page needed].
  12. Ishizuka 1992, p. 67.
  13. Ōtsuka & Kobayashi 1982, p. 345.
  14. Hirose 2003, pp. 134, 179–180.


Cite error: <ref> tags exist for a group named "lower-alpha", but no corresponding <references group="lower-alpha"/> tag was found, or a closing </ref> is missing