Princess Amelia of the United Kingdom

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Princess Amelia
Princess Amelia of the United Kingdom.jpg
Born (1783-08-07)7 August 1783
Royal Lodge, Windsor
Died Script error: The function "death_date_and_age" does not exist.
Augusta Lodge, Windsor
Burial 13 November 1810
St George's Chapel, Windsor
House Hanover
Father George III
Mother Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz

Princess Amelia of the United Kingdom (7 August 1783 – 2 November 1810) was a member of the British Royal Family. She was the youngest daughter and child of King George III of the United Kingdom and his queen consort Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz.

Early life

File:Princess Amelia in 1785.jpg
Princess Amelia in 1785

Princess Amelia was born on 7 August 1783, at the Royal Lodge, Windsor, the youngest of George III and Queen Charlotte's 15 children as well as the only of her siblings born at Windsor Castle.[1][2] It is often said that she was her father's favourite; he affectionately called her "Emily". She was born after the early deaths of her two elder brothers, Octavius (23 February 1779 - 3 May 1783) and Alfred (22 September 1780 - 20 August 1782).[3] These deaths left a gap of almost six years between Amelia and her nearest surviving sibling, Princess Sophia. She was twenty-one years younger than her eldest sibling, George, and nearly seventeen years younger than her eldest sister, Charlotte.[4] As the daughter of the monarch, she was styled Her Royal Highness the Princess Amelia from birth.

Amelia was christened at the Chapel Royal, St James's Palace by John Moore, Archbishop of Canterbury, on 17 September 1783. Her godparents were the Prince of Wales (Amelia's eldest brother), the Princess Royal (her eldest sister), and the Princess Augusta Sophia (her second eldest sister).[5][4] She was the fifteenth sibling christened there.[4] She was later confirmed by the Archbishop on 24 December 1799. [6]

Coming so soon after the death of Octavius and shortly before the end of the war between Great Britain and the United States, Amelia's birth was felt to be a beginning of a new period of hope, and much was expected of her, even from birth.[7] "Our littlest sister is without exception one of the prettiest children I have ever seen," her oldest sister wrote to Prince William when Amelia was only a month old.[4] She was expected to be as beautiful, charming, and winning as Octavius, her father's previous favorite child, had been.[4] As a result of her two brothers' deaths, Amelia was considered as her father's favourite.[8][9]

From an early age, Amelia was conscious of her rank. A popular tale relates that when the famous tragedian Sarah Siddons expressed a desire to kiss the beautiful baby, Amelia "...instantly held her little hand out to be kissed, so early had she learnt the lessons of Royalty."[10] When Amelia was three, Fanny Burney, the Queen's Keeper of the Robes, commented that the princess could be "decorous and dignified when called upon to act en princess to any strangers, as if conscious of her high rank, and the importance of condescendingly sustaining it." Burney even dubbed her "the little idol". As the youngest of the thirteen surviving children, Amelia spent most of her time with her sisters Mary and Sophia, living in various royal residences. From the beginning, the three younger princesses did not receive as much parental attention as their elder sisters had, and spent a good deal of time away from the King and Queen, communicating with them mostly by letter.

It seems that the three youngest princesses were much wilder than their elder sisters, as evidenced by their behavior when they sat for a portrait in 1785. In 1770, Zoffany had been able to paint the King, the Queen, and all six eldest children with little difficulty. In 1785, however, Copley had so much difficulty getting the dogs, birds, and especially the three royal children to sit still that he never painted another portrait.[11] Compared to the carefully planned education that Charlotte, Augusta, and Elizabeth had been given, the education given to Mary, Sophia, and Amelia was based solely on what had come before. Amelia was only five years old when her father suffered his first bout of madness. As a consequence of her father's declining health, she never experienced the closeness and affection that had characterized the family during her elder sisters' early years.[12]

The Three Youngest Princesses, by John Singleton Copley, 1785 (Amelia is the baby)

Adulthood

Prior to 1788, King George had told his daughters that he would take them to Hanover and find them suitable husbands[13] despite misgivings he had, which stemmed from his sisters' own unhappy marriages.[14] He remarked, "I cannot deny that I have never wished to see any of them marry: I am happy in their company, and do not in the least want a separation."[15] However, the King suffered his first bout of madness that year, when Amelia was aged five. Further lapses into insanity occurred in 1801 and 1804, thus forestalling talk of marriage for his daughters. The question of matrimony was rarely raised; Queen Charlotte feared that the subject, which had always discomforted the King, would push him back into insanity. Furthermore, the Queen, under strain due to her illness, wanted the princesses to remain close to her.[9][15][16]

Amelia and her sisters, Charlotte, Augusta Sophia, Elizabeth, Mary and Sophia were over-protected and isolated, which restricted meeting eligible suitors of their own age.[9]

Illness

In 1798, Princess Amelia developed a pain in the joint of her knee, and was sent to the large seaside town of Worthing for recovery. She wrote to her father, "Certainly the vapour and warm sea bath are of use and therefore I hope that I shall be able to assure you that I am better."[17] The following year, Amelia temporarily recovered enough to join her family at Weymouth, where she doted upon her niece Princess Charlotte of Wales.[18] Throughout her life, Amelia was often in poor health; at the age of fifteen, she started to suffer the early symptoms of what turned out to be tuberculosis.[9]

In 1801, the princess was sent for a seaside cure at Weymouth to improve her health.[9] Among those staying with her was the Hon. Charles FitzRoy, an equerry 21 years older than her, and the son of Charles FitzRoy, 1st Baron Southampton.[19][20] Amelia fell in love with the equerry, desiring to marry him.[9] The Queen was told of the affair by a servant, but turned a blind eye. It was hoped that such discretion would prevent the King from discovering the liaison, which may have risked sending him into one of the bouts of mental illness to which he was becoming increasingly prone. Though she never gave up hope of marrying him,[9] Amelia knew she could not legally marry FitzRoy due to the provisions of the Royal Marriages Act passed by her father's Parliament (at least until she reached the age of 25, after which she could receive permission by assent of the Privy Council).[citation needed] She would later tell her brother Frederick that she considered herself to be married, taking the initials A. F. R. (Amelia FitzRoy).[9]

In 1808, Amelia had a severe attack of measles and the depressed atmosphere at home with her mother in Windsor made her even more miserable. The anxious King George decided to send Amelia to Weymouth, accompanied by her sister Mary. Her health was improved only a little, but she found comfort in quietly resting. In 1809, she could occasionally take short walks in the garden. This improvement was but temporary, however, and in August 1810 her sufferings grew sharper, whilst in October of that year she was seized with St. Anthony's fire (erysipelas), which cut off all hope and confined her to her bed on the 25th. The king summoned his daughter's physicians to him at seven o'clock every morning and three or four other times during the day, questioning them minutely as to her condition. She lingered a few days more, waited upon to the last by her favourite and devoted sister, Mary.[21] Her 2 November death occurred on her brother Edward's birthday.[22]

The dying princess had a mourning ring made for the King, composed of a lock of her hair under crystal set round with diamonds. He purportedly burst into tears upon receiving it.[23] Otherwise, her will dictated all her possessions be given to Charles FitzRoy.[20] Amelia was buried in the royal vault in St George's Chapel, Windsor.[23][24] Her eldest brother, later George IV, is reputed to have requested her death mask.

Death and aftermath

After Amelia's death, George Villiers, the King's bailiff, and younger brother of Thomas Villiers, 2nd Earl of Clarendon, attempted to blackmail the King and Queen with letters belonging to Amelia, after the disappearance of £280,000 in his control.[25] Villiers was father of later diplomat and statesman George Villiers, 4th Earl of Clarendon.

Her death is partly credited to the decline in her father's health which resulted in his insanity[24][26][27] and the subsequent invocation of the Regency Act of 1811.[citation needed] According to his doctor Dr. Willis, the king would later cry "in a wild, monotonous, delirious way, 'Oh Emily [Princess Amelia], why won't you save your father? I hate all the physicians..."[28] Another of King George's delusions included the belief that a healthy Amelia was only staying in Hanover with a large family of her own, where she would "never grow older and always be well."[29]

Amelia has been described as a beautiful, slender girl with ruby lips and auburn hair. Reportedly she was the "most turbulent and tempestuous of all the Princesses". However, she is also said to have been gentle, unselfish and highly intelligent. These qualities led her sister-in-law Princess Caroline, who was known to despise her in-laws, to call Amelia the "most amiable of the bunch". Amelia was a favorite of both the Prince of Wales and the Duke of Sussex, who called her a "lovely creature". Amelia adored the former and once told him that she had always loved him better than her other brothers. He for his part loved her perhaps more than he did his other sisters (with the possible exception of Princess Mary) and was devastated when she died. So deeply affected was he by her death that after her funeral, he could never again sleep in a room that was not lit by several wax candles. He also burst into tears at the mention of her name more than three years after her demise.

Titles, styles, honours and arms

Titles and styles

  • 7 August 1783 – 2 November 1810: Her Royal Highness The Princess Amelia

Arms

As of 1789, as a daughter of the sovereign, Amelia had use of the arms of the kingdom, differenced by a label argent of three points, the centre point bearing a rose gules, the outer points each bearing a heart gules.[30]

Ancestors

Family of Princess Amelia of the United Kingdom
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
16. George I of Great Britain
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8. George II of Great Britain
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
17. Sophia Dorothea of Celle
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4. Frederick, Prince of Wales
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
18. John Frederick, Margrave of Brandenburg-Ansbach
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9. Caroline of Ansbach
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
19. Princess Eleonore Erdmuthe of Saxe-Eisenach
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2. George III of the United Kingdom
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
20. Frederick I, Duke of Saxe-Gotha-Altenburg
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10. Frederick II, Duke of Saxe-Gotha-Altenburg
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
21. Magdalena Sibylle of Saxe-Weissenfels
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5. Princess Augusta of Saxe-Gotha
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
22. Charles, Prince of Anhalt-Zerbst
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
11. Magdalena Augusta of Anhalt-Zerbst
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
23. Sophia of Saxe-Weissenfels
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1. Princess Amelia of the United Kingdom
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
24. Adolf Frederick I, Duke of Mecklenburg-Strelitz
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12. Adolf Frederick II, Duke of Mecklenburg-Strelitz
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
25. Maria Katharina of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6. Duke Charles Louis Frederick of Mecklenburg-Strelitz, Prince of Mirow
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
26. Christian William I of Schwarzburg-Sondershausen
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
13. Christiane Emilie of Schwarzburg-Sondershausen
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
27. Antoine Sybille of Barby-Muhlingen
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3. Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
28. Ernest III, Duke of Saxe-Hildburghausen
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14. Ernest Frederick I, Duke of Saxe-Hildburghausen
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
29. Sophie of Waldeck
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7. Princess Elizabeth Albertine of Saxe-Hildburghausen
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
30. George Louis I of Erbach-Erbach
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15. Countess Sophia Albertine of Erbach-Erbach
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
31. Amelie Katherine of Waldeck-Eisenberg
 
 
 
 
 
 

See also

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

References

Notes

  1. Fraser 2004, p. 78.
  2. Weir 2008, p. 300.
  3. Fraser 2004, pp. 76-78.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Fraser 2004, p. 79.
  5. Yvonne's Royalty Home Page: Royal Christenings
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. Fraser 2004, pp. 78-79.
  8. Panton 2011, p. 45.
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 Purdue 2004.
  10. Fraser 2004, p. 87.
  11. Fraser 2004, p. 93.
  12. Princesses, Flora Fraser
  13. Black 2006, p. 157.
  14. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. 15.0 15.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  16. Black 2006, p. 156.
  17. Fraser 2004, p. 182.
  18. Fraser 2004, p. 184.
  19. Panton 2011, pp. 45-46.
  20. 20.0 20.1 Hibbert 2000, p. 398.
  21.  Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  22. Willson 1907, p. 550.
  23. 23.0 23.1 Hibbert 2000, p. 396.
  24. 24.0 24.1 Panton 2011, p. 46.
  25. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  26. Hibbert 2000, pp. 396-397.
  27. Willson 1907, p. 549.
  28. Hibbert 2000, p. 278.
  29. Hibbert 2000, p. 400.
  30. Marks of Cadency in the British Royal Family

Bibliography

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. (subscription required for online access)
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links


Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.