Wolverhampton East by-election, 1908

The Wolverhampton East by-election of 1908 was held on 5 May 1908. The by-election was held due to the elevation to the peerage of the incumbent Liberal MP, Henry Fowler, who became Viscount Wolverhampton. It was won by the Liberal candidate George Rennie Thorne.

Background

Thorne, who had stood unsuccessfully for election twice in the South and West divisions of Wolverhampton, seemed in nearly every way the stereotypical Liberal of his day; a pronounced nonconformist, a Baptist, in a constituency where there were many nonconformist voters. In his election meetings and literature he declared himself a supporter of free trade, the proposed Bill on Old Age Pensions, restricting to eight the hours that miners could be made to work daily, women’s suffrage, Irish Home Rule and any necessary reform of the House of Lords. He was also strongly in favour of temperance and a supporter of the disestablishment of the Church of England. Fowler had been unopposed in two of the previous four elections, and had won the last, in 1906, with more than two thirds of the votes cast, a majority of 2,865.

File:Portrait of Henry Fowler, 1st Viscount Wolverhampton.jpg

Henry Fowler

General Election 1906: Wolverhampton East

Party		Candidate	Votes	%	±%
	Liberal	Rt Hon. Henry Hartley Fowler	5,610	67.1	n/a
	Liberal Unionist	Leopold Charles Maurice Stennett Amery	2,745	32.9	n/a
Majority			2,865	34.2	n/a
Turnout				85.6	n/a
	Liberal hold		Swing	n/a

Result

Thorne won the by-election by a majority of just eight votes from the Unionist candidate Leo Amery, who had lost to Fowler in 1906.

George Thorne

Wolverhampton East by-election, 1908

Party		Candidate	Votes	%	±%
	Liberal	George Rennie Thorne	4,514	50.0	-17.1
	Liberal Unionist	Leopold Charles Maurice Stennett Amery	4,506	50.0	+17.1
Majority			8	0.0	-34.2
Turnout				89.7	+4.1
	Liberal hold		Swing	-17.1

One of reasons it was such a narrow margin was the policy of the Suffragists at this time to oppose the candidates of the Liberal government because they would not bring in a Bill to provide votes for women. This was despite the individual views of the candidates, many of whom, like Thorne, were pro-women’s suffrage. A Mrs Lois Dawson, who had incorrectly been placed on the electoral register as Louis Dawson, was allowed to vote by a surprised polling station presiding officer, as she was clearly on the electoral roll. Her vote was allowed to stand, although had there been a court scrutiny of the election result it would almost certainly have been rejected.